Another Roman Catholic Priest flaunts the Law, Molests dozens of Children and walks without any prison time whatsoever!

I am so sick and tired of hearing about how Roman Catholic priests molest children at will, and ruin so many lives and never have to pay for this. This is but another example. Sure there is an 18 million dollar settlement. But there is no reform nor justice in the Roman Catholic Church. They are still collectively molesting, what is probably millions of children worldwide. The Roman Catholic church could actually be shut down using the RICO laws in America. But this won’t ever happen because the U.S. government is owned and operated by Romes legions. Notice how this pervert isn’t going to jail to spend the rest of his life rotting in jail, where he belongs. He is here grinning and smirking into the lone camera that was able to capture this criminal perverts image; Someday, God is going to wipe that stupid “what are you looking at” smirk right off his face. Until then one can only hope that someone else will step up and intervene and give him part of his reward before he dies.

And do you want to know who is just as guilty as all these criminally sexual pervert priests? All the Roman Catholics who fill their putrid, lying churches and actively support the “church” with their monies and volunterrorism. [sic]

Enjoy-
Phil


Catholic Church in Vermont settles $18m sex abuse case

The Catholic Church in Vermont has paid an $18 million (£12m) settlement to dozens of former altar boys who sued the church over allegations of sex abuse.

Published: 10:59AM BST 14 May 2010

Original link:


Rev. Edward Paquette: Paquette had worked in parishes in Rutland and Montpelier and in Christ the King Church in Burlington, and he was accused of molesting dozens of altar boys. Photo: ap

The 26 men were abused by a priest over 30 years ago.  The diocese didn’t dispute that the molestations happened. Many of the cases centred on the unfrocked Rev. Edward Paquette, who was the target of allegations before he transferred to Vermont in the mid-1970s. Paquette had worked in parishes in Rutland and Montpelier and in Christ the King Church in Burlington, and he was accused of molesting dozens of altar boys.

The 80-year-old priest recently told the Burlington Free Press newspaper he was sorry for his actions and prays daily for the families of the people he harmed.

A lawyer for the men said that they were satisfied with the outcome, and that the settlement money would be divided among them depending on the nature of their injuries and their recoveries.

“Our clients are very happy to have the opportunity to close this chapter in their lives,” said Jerome O’Neill, lawyer for the men. “All of them know that nothing goes away, nothing changes the pain. They will live with this the rest of their lives, but at least now they can put this piece behind them and move forward.”

Bishop Salvatore Matano, the Bishop of Burlington, asked for prayers to help the victims heal from the abuse. “This has been a very painful process for the victims and for all the members of our diocesan family,” he said.

“I once again apologise most sincerely for the pain the victims have suffered. I ask that you join me in praying always for these wounded and hurt brothers and sisters.”

But the head of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, or SNAP, called the settlement a business deal by the diocese.  “Anyone who assumes this somehow suggests reform in the diocese is naive,” said David Clohessy.

“The credit for this settlement lies squarely with the brave victims who had the strength to come forward, the wisdom to seek justice in the courts and determination to persist despite years of expensive, futile and self-serving legal manoeuvres by Vermont’s bishop.”

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Jesuits - Secret Society of Jesus, Vatican Atrocities, Vatican Corruption, Vatican Intrigues, Vatican Tyranny. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to

  1. I Am Proudly Catholic says:

    NOT all catholic priests are like that and in other countries in other religions (churches) the ministers etc DO THE SAME!!!! so get over your self! we knw its wrong and they should be fired from the church BUT DONT generalise about catholics and our churches. WE ARE CHRISTIAN AND BELIEVE IN GOD AS OTHERS DO! NO RELIGION HAS THE RIGHT TO BAD MOUTH ANOTHER CHURCH!!!!! REMEMBER EACH CHURCH THAT EXISTS NOW BROKE OFF FROM THE CATHOLIC CHURCH!!!!

  2. Phil Jayhan says:

    We don’t know that all Catholic Priests are not like that. Why? Because they hide their crimes and cover them up and move their priests to new countries where their crimes of pedophilia are not known.

    And no, this is mostly a “Roman Catholic” problem. Who is in the news each evening with another sordid story of pedophilia and destruction to childrens lives? Ya, the Roman Catholic church.

    And yes, each church broke off from the great whore of babylon, bit didn’t get far as most of their doctrines are still polluted with Roman Catholic heresy’s like Mary worship and praying to the dead. I would suggest that you leave the RCC and get to know God through your bible only before finding another church. Cheers!

    • I Am Proudly Catholic says:

      Actually here I have heard alot about the other churches but as they are not as big you dont hear about it, and its more in the news about catholics because we are so many in the world and the biggest in the world. If all you people get to know what we are about you will know we dont worshop mary we respect her, and we pray for our dead to go to heaven!! So DONT talk about something you know nothing about and what media has gone on about!! I will never leave my church because I pray to God and read my bible just like any other religion and I think it very rude that you will tell someone to do that because if you were a child of God you would not tell someone to leave their religion and try destroy and talk bad about our church and the people that have chosen that church and worshop God in that church! YOU are bad mouthing Gods Children. But he will judge you and those who do wrong one day! and yes he will also judge those priests and pastors and ministers that do those bad crimes. I believe we all beleive in one God it just happens to be in different churches (buildings) there is no pollution its by choice!!!
      At least we dont stoop to your level and judge people by their churches in public!!! God is not blind 🙂

      • Tosco says:

        But you don’t believe only in God, do you? I mean, there are a lot of things you do proudly believe in, right? And being proud is very very important in being a Catholic, makes your Roman spirituality so beautifully adamant, doesn’t it. Let’s see: What do you think that I should make of a book like “A Moral Reckoning. The Role of the Catholic Church in the Holocaust and Its Unfulfilled Duty of Repair”? Your mind couldn’t be ruled by any false flag benefactors, could it?

        I’m so sick of it, too, Jay, and this is just the beginning! Thanks for your incredible work.

  3. leticia john says:

    The vatican, priests, christianity as a religion, is a sham! and i couldn’t agree more!
    so divided, split up, so shady and ignorant since time immemorial!
    maybe Jesus was a good guy, and i believe he loves me and looks out for me !
    but mankind really screwed it up ! a handful of charity every now and then does not wash off the crimes of this institution, or the two faced hypocrites who run it !
    and i am catholic so u know how much i mean this!
    those who defend the stupid church should do their homework !
    remember, the lord mite have been the shepherd, but don’t just follow these men like a flock of dumb sheep !!!

  4. Leonardo says:

    FROM THE TIME OF THE COUNCIL OF ELVIRA, PRIESTS HAVE BEEN BUGGERING LITTLE BOYS!

    Religious Life Without Integrity
    The Sexual Abuse Crisis in the Catholic Church

    By Barry M Coldrey
    THE HISTORY OF THE SEXUAL ABUSE CONTROVERSY
    Clergy sexual abuse is not merely a phenomenon of the late twentieth century. However the crisis in the English-speaking church with widespread and far-reaching allegations of sexual molestation of minors has surfaced only recently. The first nationwide revelations seem to have occurred in the United States, during the years 1984-5 and have concerned the pervasive sexual abuse committed by Father Gilbert Gauthe in the Diocese of Lafayette, Louisiana.
    There had been rumblings during the 1970s, and even before, when Catholic clergy were found to be involved sexually with children or adult parishioners. However, the media generally not in every case co-operated with the church in avoiding scandal. Clerical offenders were managed privately, usually being transferred from their parishes without much publicity. They were (sometimes) required to take a period of seclusion, retreat or therapy which was neither long nor arduous.
    This willingness to conceal from public view the weaknesses, shortcomings and even criminal behaviour of community leaders and authority figures secular and religious was breaking down during the 1970s due to a variety of economic, social and political changes occurring in the Western democratic world. The best single example to illustrate what has occurred might be the vastly different media reactions to the sexual peccadillos of US Presidents John F Kennedy (1960s) and William J Clinton (1990s). It appears that both were exceptionally promiscuous over the years, but while Clinton’s relationships were the subject of an international media extravaganza; Kennedy’s thirty years previously were largely concealed from the contemporary public.
    A similar situation obtained where the church and its leaders, both national and local were concerned. The media was deferential to social, political and religious leaders. However, times were changing. At one level, the women’s movement was forcing new issues onto the socio-political agenda, and one of these issues was child sexual abuse. Molestation involved men doing nasty things to women and children. By the early 1980s, public attitudes to child abuse were being redefined, and the civil courts were willing to hear cases alleging malpractice and negligence by respected professional groups and associations. In the new legal atmosphere, priests could be sued for sexual liaisons with either teenage boys or adult women and church leaders be accused of negligence for permitting such behaviour when they were aware, or should have been aware, of these occurrences.
    On the criminal scene there were similar developments. Priests, ministers, members of Religious Orders and church workers had rarely been prosecuted in cases where there were plausible allegations of child sexual abuse. The conviction of Fr Carmelo Baltazar in 1985 for ‘lewd conduct with a minor’ and his prison sentence illustrated that this was changing. However, it was the Gauthe case and its nationwide publicity which established the scale and reality of the ‘clergy abuse’ problem.
    Fr Gilbert Gauthe ministered in a Louisiana diocese where almost two-thirds of the population were Catholics and religious loyalties were strong. Gauthe was suspected of molesting children and possession of child pornography as early as 1972. On several occasions, however, church authorities who learned of his activities responded simply by moving him to new parishes where the cycle would recommence. Over twenty years, Gauthe molested up to one hundred boys in four parishes, especially during his five years as pastor in Vermilion, Louisiana, 1978-83. During 1984, some parents brought civil charges against the diocese over Gauthe’s activities, and later that same year, criminal charges were laid.
    In due course, Gauthe was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment, and one of the victims’ families who refused to settle out of court, was awarded damages of $US 1.25 million. The case became a cause celebre and received nationwide publicity. The National Catholic Reporter followed developments in detail and Jason Berry published a widely-read book concerning the whole affair. This was in 1985. Years were to pass on the Gauthe case and in 1998, he won early parole for good conduct from a sympathetic Catholic judge. Within a few months Gauthe was arrested for molesting an underage boy and placed on probation. In the new millenium, it appears that the American church has not heard the last of Father Gilbert Gauthe.
    In the wake of this avalanche of publicity during 1985-6 some forty priests around the United States were charged with a variety of sexual offences against minors. The criminal justice system in strongly Catholic areas became increasingly willing to press charges against offending clergy. In Bristol, Rhode Island, Father William O’Connell was charged with multiple molestation and taking pornographic photos, and two priests in the diocese of Providence faced similar charges. These were merely a few personalised examples; by 1 January 1987, the Vatican nunciature in Washington, D.C. had received allegations against 135 priests or Brothers over child molestation.
    It was the unravelling of the Gauthe affair which drew attention to the widespread knowledge in some dioceses obscured in secret archives of proven or suspected molesters among the clergy, in addition to numerous other priests who were breaking their vows in regular affairs with adult women or were actively homosexual. All this with minimal official intervention. There was a strong sense of long-term cover-up of the sexual proclivities of many clergy by church leaders. All the Catholic priests and bishops involved were officially celibate. Intense media concentration on a particular priest offender or on a particularly troubled diocese or religious order led to new allegations against other men or other church organisations in different parts of the country.
    ________________________________________
    The initial reactions of Catholic Leadership
    The burgeoning number of sexual abuse scandals evoked deep concern among some Catholic observers, and in 1985, a confidential report entitled ‘The Problem of Sexual Molestation by Roman Catholic Clergy: Meeting the Problem in a Comprehensive and Responsible Manner’ was submitted to the Catholic hierarchy. The authors were Gauthe’s solicitor, F R Mouton, and two priests, T P Doyle and M Peterson. Thomas Doyle was a canon lawyer, attached to the Apostolic Nuncio in Washington, D C, while Peterson was the founder of St Luke’s Institute, Suitland, Maryland. This was a therapy programme for sexually-troubled priests.
    All three urged Catholic leaders to take strong and effective action to deal with the impending crisis, in view of the escalating scandal and the multimillion-dollar legal actions to which these problems must lead inevitably. The so-called ‘Doyle-Mouton’ Report explored some of the legal hazards which might be soon encountered, including criminal charges which might be incurred from failure to report allegations of child abuse to the secular authorities. Furthermore, destroying evidence might be construed as contempt of court or obstruction of justice. None of the writers believed that the church could expect the support from political, judicial and professional leaders of the type which had assisted in containing scandals in the past.
    In the autumn of 1985, each US bishop received a copy of the Doyle-Mouton Report and the National Conference of Catholic Bishops discussed the issue in secret sessions at their semiannual gatherings. In general, after these private discussions the bishops limited themselves to a commitment to combat child abuse wherever it arose. Any suggestion for a national episcopal response to the child abuse problem ran against the essential autonomy of each bishop in his diocese.
    Father T Doyle spoke publicly about the grave prognosis that he and his colleagues had presented at a meeting of the Canon Law Society in 1986, declaring that it was ‘the most serious crisis that we in the church have faced in centuries.’ This phrase was to be much quoted during the next 10-15 years. Doyle’s public pronouncements and the reality that they were proving accurate prophecies with the passing of the years offended many bishops. Father Doyle’s career at the Vatican diplomatic mission came to an end. He is a US Air Force Chaplain at the turn of the century.
    It is likely that the Catholic bishops hoped the sexual abuse crisis would be resolved peacefully if they maintained a consistent and discreet silence on the issue wherever possible. During the next two-three years, in fact, the issue did not produce any one US case that attracted national media attention, though a number of local affairs continued to simmer. However, 1985 had been a climatic year, when the clergy sexual abuse crisis is viewed historically.
    ________________________________________
    ‘It happened in 1985. The dam has sprung many leaks. No, this wasn’t your ordinary dam. It wasn’t holding back torrents of water. Instead the dam held unspeakable secrets. Secrets that the Catholic church had known about for a long time … To faithful Catholics the church seemed a fortress … built with the solid bricks and plastic mortar of sanctity, virtue, selflessness and adherence to the laws of God and the holy men who ruled the Church guided by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. This was true in many ways, but not the whole truth. Those on the inside knew that this was partly a facade. The dam was honeycombed with secrets, lies and the conflict of sex, power and political intrigue.
    The huge crack which appeared in the American church facade were the cluster of revelations coming out of the swampy Cajun country of rural Louisiana about a priest who had molested scores of boys. His name was Fr Gilbert Gauthe and his story was over all the media outlets in the country. (Adapted) Whitney, J, ‘Survivors of Clergy Abuse in Catholic Seminaries’, Phoenix, Arizona, 1998.
    ________________________________________
    In 1987-8, interest in clerical sexual and financial scandals shifted temporarily to the Protestant ‘televangelists’, and the Catholic bishops were somewhat relieved. The four major cases of these years concerned Jim Bakker, Jimmy Swaggart, Tony Leyva and the South African Rev Allan Boesak. There was little sense of impending crisis in the Catholic church. This change of emphasis may have encouraged Catholic authorities to believe that the Doyle-Mouton report had been unnecessarily pessimistic in its predictions of disaster.
    Treatment Centres
    In one important area, church leaders acted effectively, encouraging the establishment of discreetly placed treatment centres to assist troubled priests and Brothers with sexual problems to receive assistance to solve their problems and continue their ministry – or prepare to live a normal life outside their former vocation..
    ________________________________________
    After I was ordained in 1959, I learned that some priests had sex with adults and even minors and to some degree this behaviour was taken for granted by church authorities…an atmosphere of crisis regarding this issue did not exist. The secret world of sexual activity with minors, was known by the Catholic hierarchy, and though considered unfortunate and morally wrong, was accepted as an inevitable and easily forgivable failure of some priests. (Sipe, A.W.R. Preliminary Expert Report, Trial of Fr Rudolph Kos)
    ________________________________________
    Until the 1960s, if a priest had sex or fell in love these were considered ordinary and expectable moral/spiritual problems. The growing recognition of the psychological dimension of such moral/spiritual problems coincided with the opening of Catholic treatment centres.
    The Marselen Institute, Massachusetts, 1950s…predecessor of the St. Luke Institute. The Marselen Institute evolved from a treatment centre for children into a treatment centre of priests with behavioural problems.
    The Hartford Retreat was opened in 1822. This facility now operates as the Institute of Living.
    The Servants of the Paraclete opened their first spiritual retreat centre in 1949 at Jemez Springs, New Mexico to care for priests with serious problems and their second renewal centre was founded in Nevis, Minnesota some time later. In 1957, on these properties more specialised treatment centres for priests with alcohol problems were set up as ‘Guest Houses’.
    In the late 1960s and early 1970s, a number of Catholic treatment centres specifically for priests and religious opened, all coinciding with a growing awareness among Catholic bishops and religious superiors that sexual and moral/spiritual problems had psychological dimensions.
    These centres included Southdown in Toronto (Canada) and the House of Affirmation. In the 25 years after 1970, some 1300 US priests were assisted in these facilities. (In the US at any one time there are around 45,000-50,000 priests – this figure being listed to keep a sense of proportion.)
    Much later, in 1997, the Encompass Programme was established in both Sydney and Melbourne (Australia) to assist sexually-troubled clergy and religious, as a pro-active step to address the child molestation problem. On 24 October 1998, the course Director, Dr Gerardine Taylor said that 74 men has been assessed for the intensive programme which could be entered voluntarily but is usually undertaken at the request of a bishop or Religious Superior.
    The New Wave of Cases, 1989-92
    The new wave of scandals broke first in Newfoundland (1988) with criminal prosecutions for repeated molestations committed by two parish priests. Over time other priests were implicated until some ten per cent of the diocescan clergy were tainted by allegations, arrest, trial and commonly conviction. In the spring of 1989 attention shifted to the long history of both physical and sexual abuse committed by members of the (Irish) Christian Brothers Congregation against teenage boys in the Mount Cashel boys home in St John’s. In this case, allegations had surfaced originally in 1975 and in a widespread state-church cover-up certain Brothers had been permitted to leave the Province without facing criminal proceedings when investigations were closed.
    The story remained in the headlines for several years, with a Royal Commission, an internal investigation by the Catholic church, a series of criminal trials and highly-publicised civil actions and negotiations for compensation for the numerous victims.
    ________________________________________
    The year 1990 marked a watershed as confused church authorities began to lose their damage-control efforts to the rising tide of the voices of the victims. The main line of the story is well-known. Celibacy is no longer a taken-for-granted element of priestly life. The mysterious, even sacred aura that seemed to accompany the men who chose celibacy began to dissipate long ago. Too many left vows behind. Too many ordinary Catholics saw their favourite priests, and often, nuns, pair off and leave their rectories and orders. Moreover, as “the world” now knows that too many and their numbers kept growing became sexually active not as a result of an honest and sincere search of their vocations in a changing church, but in an evil, repugnant way, as abusers of children. (Kennedy, E., ‘Sex abuse crisis not invented’, National Catholic Reporter, Vol 32 No 30, 24 May 1996, pp 4-7)
    ________________________________________
    The History of the Sexual Abuse Controversy in Australia
    The sexual abuse crisis in Australia was influenced by events in the United States, but commenced with the controversy over child migration and the claims of widespread abuses committed against children housed in Western Australian Catholic orphanages after World War II. It is not possible here to recall the history of child migration with more than a glance. After the war, some 3500 orphaned, abandoned, often-illegitimate children were brought to Australia from Britain and Malta under various schemes by church agencies, about one-half of them under Catholic auspices.The last child migrants moved into employment during the buoyant 1950s and 1960s and many years passed before dissatisfaction with the schemes was voiced publicly.
    Community attention in Western Australia was first drawn to child migration, and to the complaints of abusive behaviour in some of the state’s residential care, in an exposé in The Western Mail (Weekend), during August 1987. A former child migrant, Gordon Grant (Nigel Fitzgibbon), had interested the editor, André Malan, in the problems child migrants were having as a result of their earlier experiences.[1] Under emotive headings such as ‘The lost children Britain sent away to Australia’, ‘The faceless kids of Fairbridge Farm’ and ‘The nightmare of Bindoon’ the articles revealed an underside of Western Australian residential care which had lain dormant for thirty and more years. Some former inmates denounced child migration as such ‘robbing them of their identity’; others claimed horrific physical and sexual abuse in the institutions in which they were placed. The focus was on St. Joseph’s Farm and Trade School, Bindoon; Fairbridge Farm School, Pinjarra and Nazareth House, Geraldton.The focus was on Catholic institutions managed by Religious Brothers.
    The abuse alleged ran the whole gamut institutional procedures which stripped residents of their identity, relentlessly, hard physical labour unsuited to the age and stage of the children in lieu of mandated schooling, and using primitive implements to boot, all in order to construct the massive, ornamental farm school buildings. There were frequent even daily beatings with cane or strap or indeed, any implement that came to hand. Gordon Grant reported that on one occasion his nose was broken when the principal, the soon-to-be-notorious Brother P Keaney smashed his fist into his face, and that he had been genitally fondled on occasion by two other Brothers. Boys were regularly beaten on their bare backsides. Physical and sexual abuse were the main issues.
    Understandably, The Western Mail exposé sparked a spirited correspondence during the following week, with letter writers divided over the child migration experience. More allegations surfaced. One former Christian Brother, identified only as ‘Michael’, was reported as saying: ‘it was unbelievable the things that went on at Bindoon, including sodomy.’ Over the years, the controversy was to wax and wane, but the issues were defined in those pioneer newspaper articles.
    Other journalists were encouraged to explore the child migration-orphanage abuse issue. Its explosive mix of ‘orphans, sex, the church, stomach-turning abuses and government negligence’ had the potential to excite widespread public interest. The mix regularly sent journalists into a ‘feeding frenzy’. However, in the short term, after the initial articles and the reaction, little occurred. The agencies especially the Catholic Church and the Christian Brothers did not respond directly.
    The controversy was revived a year later. On 31 August 1988, Derryn Hinch, a controversial national TV commentator and self-styled crusader, ran an eight-minute segment entitled ‘Christian Brothers?’ on Channel 7 show Hinch, which was shown in all states except Western Australia.[2] This show sparked controversy for a while, then the issue lay dormant for a second time. In 1989, child migration impinged on the public mind more strongly with the release of Philip Bean and Joy Melville’s best selling book, Lost Children of the Empire , which brought knowledge of the schemes to a wider, international, audience. A Domino films, TV documentary based squarely on the revelations made in the book was shown both in Australia and the UK and increased the influence generated by the book itself. The most disturbing accounts focussed increasingly on the Christian Brothers and their St Joseph’s Farm School, Bindoon, which was rapidly acquiring notoriety as the ‘Dotheboys Hall’ of the child migration era.
    The showing of Lost Children of the Empire sparked widespread community debate throughout the media and particularly on ‘Talk-Back’ radio — especially in Western Australia.[3] It was around this time that Australian Democrats Senator, Jean Jenkins, raised the issue in the national parliament in an attempt to gain a public enquiry into the working of the child migration schemes. Her efforts were opposed by Liberal Senator, John Panizza, who suggested that the children had been given a good chance in another country.’ He dismissed the allegations of widespread abuse in Catholic orphanages on the grounds that 30-40 years had elapsed before these complaints had been raised, and the whole business was unfair to the carers many deceased or very elderly ‘who had spent a lifetime caring for the underprivileged.'[4]
    The response of the church and child migration agencies to the increasingly bitter debate was still muted. It will be considered in a later section. Meanwhile, the year 1990, revealed four books published each of which focused on child migration and Australian orphanage history. In Perth, Lionel Welsh released his controversial autobiography, Geordie, Orphan of the Empire which described the brutal regime at the St Joseph’s farm school, a theme developed in his second book,The Bindoon File. Both books received considerable publicity in Western Australia. John Lane’s autobiography, Fairbridge Kid , was less controversial and recounted his time at Fairbridge, Pinjarra during the inter war years. In Sydney, Alan Moore published biographical accounts of thirty child migrants who came to Australia from British orphanages under the auspices of Barnardo’s.
    The release of each of these books generated a measure of publicity and the issue was gradually generating wider ramifications. The consistent allegations of widespread physical and sexual abuses by some staff at respected church and charitable institutions raised this hitherto dormant issue before the public and made further allegations likely from other areas of the church’s ministry This is precisely what occurred.[5]
    The media frenzy
    ‘Sex sells, and priest sex sells better.’ At one level the spasms of media concentration on the child migration issue followed from this dictum. However, there had been massive changes in the Australian social climate over recent years and it is important to understand them in explaining the drift of events. As a result of the work of feminist theorists and workers, more had become known about the patterns and incidence of violence against women and children since the 1970s than was known previously. The Catholic church did not appreciate the shift in community attitudes which had occurred in this area, and which were to shift further against abuse under the cover of respected agencies or bureaucratic indifference.
    With this understanding came attempts to address the issues of violence against women and children. Parliament and the courts had been defining violence within the home as criminal behaviour, have given police added powers to move against domestic violence, and have changed rape laws to remove bias toward the rapist and against the victim.[6] In this context the claims of former residents in the Western Australian orphanages generated outrage at a time when the community was much more sensitised to issues involving domestic and by extension institutional violence. There was less respect for religious leaders as such.
    Violence against women and children was newsworthy, especially if alleged to have happened in church institutions. The church often presents itself or appears as the moral guardian of society. Yet there can be resistance, opposition and even antagonism in some quarters to that perceived role. Stories of widespread abuse and sexual misconduct by church leaders were attractive because of their contradiction of the Christian principles which clerical rhetoric offers to the community. The church is deflated; many in society are delighted.
    Abuse in North American Residential Care
    The scene in Western Australia was intense but isolated and parochial. However, in other parts of the English-speaking world, reports of widespread physical and sexual abuses by Canadian and American Brothers and priests were surfacing and reaching the Australian public. In 1989, the Christian Brothers Mount Cashel orphanage in St John’s, Newfoundland, was the subject of a state investigation (the Hughes Inquiry) over claims of severe physical and sexual abuse stretching back over decades. There had been a formal 1975 cover-up of explicit allegations of widespread abuse at that time. The commission proceedings were prime time cable viewing in Newfoundland and intensely reported throughout Canada. In 1990, Michael Harris, a controversial investigative journalist, published his best-selling story of the widespread abuse and scandalous cover-ups by the Catholic Church and state government of Newfoundland of the crimes committed at Mount Cashel orphanage.[7]
    News of these events reached Australia and Michael Harris’s book was reviewed in the media and available to interested parties. In Newfoundland, civil and criminal proceedings followed the Hughes Inquiry and eventually through the following decade 26 priests and Brothers were convicted of sexual offenses against underage children in the province, nine of them associated with the Mount Cashel orphanage. The Archbishop of St John’s resigned. Over time, the Newfoundland provincial government arranged an out-of-court, $C 18 million settlement with the orphanage victims, and at the present time is attempting to recoup this money from the Christian Brothers.[8] All of these events were publicised in Australia as they occurred on the other side of the world.
    Some of this is to anticipate. By 1990s, the public was learning that it was not only possible, but almost commonplace for Catholic priests and Religious Brothers officially celibate to be sexually active in practice, and for senior churchmen ‘to turn a blind eye’ wherever possible when revelations came to the surface. At around this time, but for a more specialist audience, U S psychiatrist, Richard Sipe, published the first of his major books, the fruits of a thirty year investigation, Sexuality and the Search for Celibacy: A Secret World, revealing that a large minority of American Catholic clergy were not observing celibacy with any consistency.[9] It was probable that the situation was similar in corresponding countries.
    Meanwhile, in June 1991 in Western Australia, the Child Migrant Friendship Society was largely superceded by another ‘survivors’ advocacy association, called VOICES, formed in Perth as a self-help and lobby group for one-time Catholic orphanage residents, many of them former child migrants. Its leader was retired primary school principal, Bruce Blyth, and the organisation involved a range of concerned professionals working with a vigorous group of ‘survivors’ to lobby for a parliamentary or judicial inquiry to be held into the child migration scheme and the abuses alleged to have occurred in the state’s children’s homes. VOICES had around three hundred members. VOICES propaganda necessarily highlighted the short-comings of priests and male religious in Catholic care.
    The ABC TV mini-series, The Leaving of Liverpool , was shown in Australia, 8-9 July 1992. The Leaving of Liverpool was the single greatest influence in raising public awareness of the issue of the abuse and exploitation of children who had been sent to Australia under the Child Migration schemes. There had been an extensive media preparation, and the actual release could have been an anti-climax, but the reverse was the truth. The screening was a major topic of discussion in the media and was acclaimed highly by reviewers in metropolitan newspapers around Australia. Shortly afterwards, the unedited version of Lost Children of the Empire was shown to a large audience and the twin issues of ‘child migration’ and ‘orphanage abuse’ were becoming well-known. The ABC Compass programme The Ultimate Betrayal concerned with sexual abuse by clergy was screened at this time.
    The Leaving of Liverpool , The Ultimate Betrayal and Lost Children of the Empire guaranteed that the issue had moved from exploitation and physical abuse to claims of deviant sexual abuse inflicted on some of the residents by Brothers, priests and respected church workers. The strong sense of shame which often silences victims of sexual abuse was being broken and more men (and women) felt able to name their childhood experiences. They were no longer isolated. Many victims were relieved that their childhood experiences were being recognised and they felt themselves vindicated. The publicity was encouraging other victims to come forward; most genuine; some bogus.
    Church grappling with sexual abuse
    In Australia the Catholic Church did not commence addressing the problem of sexual abuse until 1988 and for some years progress was to be painfully slow in framing protocols and agreed responses. The stimulus to face the issue was triggered by events overseas, especially in the United States, not by pressures within Australia, though this was to change soon as the previous section has shown.
    In November 1988, the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference established a ‘Special Issues Committee’ including people with relevant experience in dealing with child sexual abuse to consider the implications of allegations of criminal behaviour, especially relating to children, made against members of the clergy.
    The Committee was asked to develop a protocol to be used when an accusation was made, and to advise on its implementation. There were delays; the absence of media attention to the issue in Australia precluded any sense of urgency. A draft of the ‘Protocol’ for dealing with allegations of criminal behaviour was circulated to the bishops and later to diocesan priests by early 1992, some three to four years after the committee had received its brief.
    In January 1993, the Australian Bishops Conference issued the ‘Pastoral Statement on Child Protection and Child Sexual Abuse’ The Statement acknowledged in muted tones that some clergy had been offenders and that the Church may not have treated these incidents as seriously as they deserved. A statement of principles for dealing with sexual abuse was released by the Church in April 1994. This was around six years since the ‘Special Issues Committee’ had commenced its deliberations.
    Why were there these long delays in defining and implementing policies to deal with a sexual abuse crisis which was to see some 70-80 priests and Religious Brothers convicted of sexual crimes against children during the last decade of the twentieth century in Australia? There are a number of reasons:
    • The ‘Special Issues Committee’ and its sub-committees were composed of busy people, home-based over a vast continent. Hence ‘the tyranny of distance’ operated; meetings were difficult to schedule; easy to cancel. It was hard to maintain momentum.
    • Moreover, and this is difficult for some to understand in view of the media barrage and the substantial number of criminal convictions, there was little sense of urgency among many Catholic decision-makers. ‘Denial’ in most of its variations was widespread among priests and Religious throughout the country as to the seriousness of the problem; the scandal involved; the exasperation of many of the laity.
    • In addition, the Catholic Church in any country or region is not a monolith. Within the magisterium, each bishop is autonomous within his diocese; each higher Superior of a Religious Congregation is autonomous within his Order or Province. There are higher authorities in the Sacred Congregations in Rome, but approaches to them are slow and cumbersome. When ‘push comes to shove’ no bishop or higher Superior of a Religious Congregation could be forced to co-operate with the ‘Special Issues Committee’ or its protocols or recommendations in any meaningful way if s/he chose not to do so.
    •The Catholic church in Australia has around 5 million adherents of whom, some 20-25% worship regularly. There are some 30 dioceses; 50 bishops; 4,000 priests; and 140 Religious Congregations represented in the country, not to mention the hundreds of schools and charitable works maintained by the church.
    ________________________________________
    One additional reason for the long delays in responding to the escalating abuse crisis was the conviction of some bishops and priests that new procedures were not required. Father Brian Lucas, Chancellor of the Archdiocese of Sydney, attempted to answer this in an article in small in-house journal for Catholic priests. (Lucas, B. ‘Codes of Conduct’, The Swag, December 1997, p. 7)
    There is a fashion at the moment for groups to ‘codify’ their agreed standards of professional conduct and there have been discussions as to their relevance for priests. However, clergy desire professional status and the there [? sic] have been problems:
    The sad experience of the past ten years of so of numerous allegations of clerical misconduct, ranging from lapses of virtue to the most heinous criminal misconduct, ought to prompt serious reflection about the quality of our formation in our professional life.
    We have to face the fact that trust has been eroded. We need to rebuild this trust, not however, by institutionalising distrust.
    If we agree that we need to do better, then we can legitimately look for some tools to help improve the standard of our professional conduct.
    One such tool is an agreed written statement of the standards we set ourselves. Sometimes such statements are called ‘codes of conduct’.
    If we argue about the title we do not really resolve the real issue which is about the content … we ought to know what we expect of ourselves and our peers.
    We ought to listen to what others expect of us
    The statement of these expectations should not be a legislative document that restricts or penalises. This runs the risk of institutionalising distrust.
    It should be a liberating document that sets out the goals to which we aspire.
    ________________________________________
    In December 1996, the Catholic Church released a new protocol ‘Toward Healing’ which outlined the basic principles for the Church’s response to complaints of sexual abuse and the procedures for dealing with such complaints. After further consultation, ‘Toward Healing’ was declared operational on 31 March 1997. These guidelines were developed by the National Committee for Professional Standards, a Committee established jointly by the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference and the Australian Conference of Leaders of Religious Institutes.
    The Professional Standards Committee continues as the national body overseeing the implementation of policies and procedures across Australia. In each of the five provinces of the Australian church, there is a Professional Standards Resource Group (PSRG) consisting of one priest, one member of a Religious Congregation and up to ten other persons with experience in child protection, the social sciences, civil and church law and/or industrial relations. These groups are to act as advisers to Church bodies within their province, and are to provide Contact Persons, Assessors, Victims Support Persons, Accused’s Support Persons, facilitators and reviewers.
    Although the PSRG were formed with a mandate confined to matters concerning sexual abuse by people working for the Church, this has been widened to incorporate allegations of physical, emotional and psychological abuse, as well as other failures to meet accepted professional standards.
    Meanwhile the National Committee for Professional Standards was working to produce a statement of ethical standards for Catholic clergy and members of Religious Congregations. A draft document ‘Integrity in Ministry’ was released for comment in 1997 and have an exhaustive period of consultation was revised for publication two years later. The name remained the same.
    The ten to twelve years of endeavour to provide the framework for the Australian church to deal with sexual abuse crisis has born [? borne] considerable fruit with a range of documents and responses. However, few of the efforts addressed the underlying problems of the celibate/ ‘celibate’ clergy and members of Religious Orders maintaining their permanent commitments to chastity. The focus has been understandably on matters of criminal conduct by clergy-child molestation, not on the ‘lapses of virtue’ by vowed Religious, which are either completely normal (heterosexual affairs) or increasingly accepted socially (gay sexual activity by consenting adults).
    One of the reasons for this treatment ‘Religious Life without Integrity’ is to raise these issues and break the surrounding taboos. All the evidence coming to investigators suggests fairly widespread (but minority) lapses from celibate standards among clergy and vowed Religious. Moreover, while these ‘lapses from virtue’ are completely legal, they have ramifications in a church whose male leadership proclaims its commitment to celibacy.
    Footnotes
    Click on the number to return to text.
    [1] Malan, A ‘The lost children Britain sent away to Australia’, The Western Mail (Perth, Western Australia), 8-9 August 1987 (p 20), and see 15-16 (p 26-27), 22-23 (pp 24-25), and 29-30 (p 26) Aug ’87.
    [2] Welsh, L P Geordie, Orphan of the Empire , P & B Press, Perth, 1990; The Bindoon File , P & B Press, Perth, 1991.
    [3] ‘Child migrants take a journey into the past”, West Australian , 15 May 1989, and ‘Gathering mourns its lost childhood’, West Australian , 23 June 1989, gave widespread publicity to the objectives of the Child Migrant Friendship Society.
    [4] West Australian, 20 June 1989 and 17 August 1989
    [5] Miller, J K, ‘To whom do I turn ? A study in institutional child abuse’, MA thesis, Murdoch University, Western Australia, 1992.
    [6] Horsfield, P, ‘An analysis of the media debate following the ABC Compass Program ‘The Ultimate Betrayal’, Australian Journalism Review, Vol 15 No 1, January-June, 1993, p 5
    [7] Harris, M, Unholy Orders: Tragedy at Mount Cashel, Viking, Penguin, Ontario, 1990.
    [8] Hughes Inquiry
    [9] Sipe, R , Sexuality and the Search for Celibacy: A Secret World, Brunner/Mazel, New York, 1990.

  5. Zariyah-EgyptianQueen says:

    It really kills me how the believers of a fake religion, used to instill fear but adoration in the sheeples of the world can be so shocked and appalled by the allegations of those accused. When not so long ago the Catholic Church and other religions were responsible for the hangings, deaths, rapes, etc. of so many people from around the world…including their own church members that thought what they were doing was wrong. The promotion of a mythreligion like Christianity has facilitated the deaths of so many people through fear tactics and it is really sad. Why don’t we do what the Catholic Church would have done long ago: put them to death by fire or hangings?! If your religion is so important to you you wouldnt commit those types of crimes.

  6. henry says:

    is the right time the roman catholic priest to start getting married and not be ashamed that if they start getting married other church will laugh at them.remember you can not cheat nature,is only the truth shall set u free not the church.for the diocese that think they can buy justice with money.(shame on you) what will your followers emulate from you?you people should go and marry and set your self free from this bondage.you can hide from man but you can’t hide from true God

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s